The ethics of zoos is a topic that has sparked ongoing debate. While zoos play an essential role in species conservation and public education, questions about the morality of keeping animals in captivity persist. Striking a balance between conservation goals and the rights of individual animals is a challenge that zoos continue to face.

On one hand, zoos contribute significantly to the conservation of endangered species. Many zoos participate in breeding programs designed to increase the population of species that are at risk of extinction in the wild. These efforts have saved species like the California condor and the Arabian oryx from disappearing entirely. Furthermore, zoos serve as vital centers of research, providing valuable insights into animal biology, behavior, and health that can be applied to species in the wild.

On the other hand, critics argue that keeping animals in captivity, even for conservation purposes, raises ethical concerns. Some argue that animals in zoos are deprived of the freedom to roam, hunt, and engage in other natural behaviors. Despite advancements in enclosure design and enrichment practices, critics claim that no man-made habitat can fully replicate the complexities of an animal's natural environment.

Zoos are working to address these concerns by focusing on animal welfare and creating spaces that more closely mimic the wild. Larger, more naturalistic enclosures, behavioral enrichment programs, and a focus on education rather than entertainment are all part of the modern zoo's ethical framework. While the debate continues, most agree that zoos must prioritize the well-being of the animals in their care while contributing to global conservation efforts.